Arizona law defines an access device as any card, account number, code, password, or encryption key that could be used to access an electronic device like a computer or cellphone.Īdditionally, Arizona law presumes that a person possessing five or more access devices-such as passwords or encryption keys-without the owner’s consent does intend to use or distribute them, such as giving or selling them to others to use.
The defendant’s actions served no legitimate purpose.ĪRS 13-2316.01: Unlawful Possession of an Access DeviceĪRS 13-2316.01 says it is illegal for a person to possess and somehow distribute an “access device” without the consent of the person who owns it.The defendant’s actions caused emotional distress to the victims involved.To be found guilty of ARS 13-2316, a prosecutor must prove that: A Phoenix resident hacks into the network of a local bank intending to steal bank customer social security numbers.A high school student pranks his school by placing a virus on their system, wiping out student grades.A disgruntled employee removes or deletes important files off their work laptop before giving it back.Some examples of possible charges under ARS 13-2316 include: ARS 13-2316: Computer TamperingĪrizona law defines computer tampering as the act of accessing, changing, damaging, or destroying a computer or part of a computer system or network, or changing or deleting computer programs or data, without authorization. Let’s go over each type of cyber law and look at some examples. There are three main laws for cyber crimes in Arizona: computer tampering, unlawful possession of an access device, and unauthorized release of information. In Arizona, if you are charged with a cyber crime, you may find yourself facing felony charges under law ARS 13-2316: Computer Tampering. This increased use of computers has sparked a rise in cyber crimes. From business deals to banking transactions to ordering groceries online, computers are a mainstay in our lives. Rogers College of Law Criminal Defense Clinic.In today’s world, people use computers for everything. Since 2017, she has taught and directed the James E. She handles felony cases, including capital cases. Sarah Kostick is an attorney at the Pima County Public Defender’s Office. Among other involvements, David served on the Supreme Court’s Criminal Rules Task Force, the Supreme Court’s Rule 32 Task Force, and the State Bar Criminal Jury Instruction Committee. He carries a caseload of approximately twenty-five cases on direct and collateral appeal. She currently also is an adjunct professor at ASU, teaching a class on the death penalty.ĭavid Euchner is the appellate unit supervisor and resource counsel of the Pima County Public Defender’s Office, where he has worked for fifteen years. During her 30+ years of practice, she has tried numerous cases as well as worked in appeals. Susan Corey represents death penalty clients in State post-conviction litigation at the Maricopa County Office of the Legal Advocate. Rogers College of Law in 1997, and since then has dedicated his career to criminal law, working as a prosecutor and public defender. Time: 12:00 PM - 1:15 PM Please join this group of professionals for a panel discussion on capital punishment: